<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lost Reverse-Engineered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/</link>
	<description>Music, Television, Books and everything else that crosses our minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike rot</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>mike rot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>testing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>testing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty_James</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty_James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>second disc of season 3... now didn&#039;t they split 3 into 3 and 3.5? So it&#039;s still the begining of season 3 then? Or am I wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my opinion it&#039;s season 4 that is terrible. And then there&#039;s season which will come a package called season 4.5 but was in fact shown on television a year after season 4 and is therefore a different season regardless of what everyone else says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Season 5 is better than 4 but continues to suffer from some of the  season 4 set backs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>second disc of season 3&#8230; now didn&#39;t they split 3 into 3 and 3.5? So it&#39;s still the begining of season 3 then? Or am I wrong.</p>
<p>In my opinion it&#39;s season 4 that is terrible. And then there&#39;s season which will come a package called season 4.5 but was in fact shown on television a year after season 4 and is therefore a different season regardless of what everyone else says.</p>
<p>Season 5 is better than 4 but continues to suffer from some of the  season 4 set backs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike rot</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>mike rot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>midway through the 2nd disc of season 3.  If I recall, wasn&#039;t season 3 supposed to be the shitty season?  I am enjoying it so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>midway through the 2nd disc of season 3.  If I recall, wasn&#39;t season 3 supposed to be the shitty season?  I am enjoying it so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty_James</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty_James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>So... second half of the 3rd season? Toward the end? More toward the middle? Where?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; second half of the 3rd season? Toward the end? More toward the middle? Where?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike rot</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>mike rot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>Without delving into spoilers I am at the point where the fat suit has come off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without delving into spoilers I am at the point where the fat suit has come off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty James</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>much better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>much better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikerot</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>mikerot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>testing disqus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>testing disqus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty James</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>@ I mean really, was it absolutely necessary to convey that the character has slacked off and become lazy

absolutely necessary? I don&#039;t know, I thought it was a good way to visualize the deterioration of the fleet. And also the passage of time. Lee looked like shit, which was awesome.

Maybe it&#039;s my different perspective from having seen the final seasons. The problem with BSG is not too many(1) fat suits.

Also, the episode that you complained about that begins with Lee floating in space... isn&#039;t that the conclussion of the Admr. Kane storyline? That&#039;s a great episode.

If you&#039;ve seen the fat suit that means your into season 3. How far are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ I mean really, was it absolutely necessary to convey that the character has slacked off and become lazy</p>
<p>absolutely necessary? I don&#8217;t know, I thought it was a good way to visualize the deterioration of the fleet. And also the passage of time. Lee looked like shit, which was awesome.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s my different perspective from having seen the final seasons. The problem with BSG is not too many(1) fat suits.</p>
<p>Also, the episode that you complained about that begins with Lee floating in space&#8230; isn&#8217;t that the conclussion of the Admr. Kane storyline? That&#8217;s a great episode.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve seen the fat suit that means your into season 3. How far are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rot</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>rot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>what was the point of the fat suit though, I mean really, was it absolutely necessary to convey that the character has slacked off and become lazy... did they have to go full-fatso? 

and no Eye of the Tiger montage to show him getting fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what was the point of the fat suit though, I mean really, was it absolutely necessary to convey that the character has slacked off and become lazy&#8230; did they have to go full-fatso? </p>
<p>and no Eye of the Tiger montage to show him getting fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty James</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>I loved Lee in the fat suit. He wish he could&#039;ve been fat all season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Lee in the fat suit. He wish he could&#8217;ve been fat all season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rot</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>rot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>an addendum, though related only to Battlestar Galactica, so far Lost has not made this mistake:

21) Moratorium on fat suits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an addendum, though related only to Battlestar Galactica, so far Lost has not made this mistake:</p>
<p>21) Moratorium on fat suits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikerot</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>mikerot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 13:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>why is the sidebar not refreshing more often? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is the sidebar not refreshing more often?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew_James</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew_James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 15:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>So for the thumbs down, thumbs up thing with this new comment system, are you supposed to give the thumbs down for simply not agreeing with someone, or if it&#039;s just a stupid or off-topic comment? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So for the thumbs down, thumbs up thing with this new comment system, are you supposed to give the thumbs down for simply not agreeing with someone, or if it&#039;s just a stupid or off-topic comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikerot</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>mikerot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 14:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>This is just a test of the new plug-in we are working with </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just a test of the new plug-in we are working with</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikerot</title>
		<link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/04/lost-reverse-engineered/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>mikerot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 14:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morepop.rowthree.com/?p=732#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>This is just a test of the new plug-in we are working with, ignore </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just a test of the new plug-in we are working with, ignore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

